[ PDF / Epub ] ☆ Humour Author Noël Carroll – Dcrjservices.co.uk

Humour summary Humour , series Humour , book Humour , pdf Humour , Humour e8ec1d6295 Humour Is A Universal Feature Of Human Life It Has Been Discovered In Every Known Human Culture, And Thinkers Have Discussed It For Over Two Thousand Years In This Very Short Introduction Noel Carroll Considers The Nature And Value Of Humour From Its Leading Theories And Its Relation To Emotion And Cognition, To Ethical Questions Of Its Morality And Its Significance In Shaping Society.About The Series Oxford S Very Short Introductions Series Offers Concise And Original Introductions To A Wide Range Of Subjects From Islam To Sociology, Politics To Classics, Literary Theory To History, And Archaeology To The Bible Not Simply A Textbook Of Definitions, Each Volume In This Series Provides Trenchant And Provocative Yet Always Balanced And Complete Discussions Of The Central Issues In A Given Discipline Or Field Every Very Short Introduction Gives A Readable Evolution Of The Subject In Question, Demonstrating How The Subject Has Developed And How It Has Influenced Society Eventually, The Series Will Encompass Every Major Academic Discipline, Offering All Students An Accessible And Abundant Reference Library Whatever The Area Of Study That One Deems Important Or Appealing, Whatever The Topic That Fascinates The General Reader, The Very Short Introductions Series Has A Handy And Affordable Guide That Will Likely Prove Indispensable.


10 thoughts on “Humour

  1. says:

    Some scholars refer to the stimulus in humor as the holy grail of humor studies Though this is appropriate, it gives the impression that the stimulus question is the only important one It would be equally if notuseful if holy grail referred to both stimulus and response, the two being inherently linked by the way they are defined.There is a theory that establishes such a link It is better t...


  2. says:

    Chapter 1 The nature of humourChapter 2 Humour, emotion, and cognitionChapter 3 Humour and value


  3. says:

    si bien no me le todo lo que est escrito sobre el humor, luego de leer 3 4 referentes o libros cl sicos que tratan las teor as m s conocidas comenzar la lectura de un libro que pretende ser una introducci n no me pareci atractivo Sin embargo el tema es tan vasto e interesante que no dejas de aprender nuevos enfoques de estudio, teor as y autores, por lo que este libro fue muy interesante en este sentido.Si bien recorre las teor as principales, como muchos otros libros se centra en la teor si bien no me le todo lo que est escrito sobre el humor, luego de leer 3 4 referentes o libros cl sicos que tratan las teor as m s conocidas comenzar la lectura de un libro que prete...


  4. says:

    She Favors the incongruity theory while also acknowledging the superiority theory has some useful applications Humour a social event that disrupts norms and and creates social bonding through culture and subculture mutual understanding and merit r...


  5. says:

    Fome as hell.


  6. says:

    Has to be the dryest, most unfunny book on humor ever written Reminded me of the Bruno Kirby character in GOOD MORNING, VIETNAM I know comedy And his defense of questionable humor, esp his insistence that thinking ...


  7. says:

    I like the fact this book was brief, I like it tried to tackle the very hard to tackle subject question of What is Humour Is Humour an Emotion and What is the Purpose of Humour I think out of the three sections it presented the theories of humour the best However all three sections suffered from the fact this was written by a philosopher and not a psychologist in other words it was written by a non scientist and without any research to back his claims up it just becomes opinions no I like the fact this book was brief, I like it tried to tackle the very hard to tackle subject question of What is Humour Is Humour an Emotion and What is the Purpose of Humour I think out of the three sections it presented the theories of humour the best However all three sections suffered from the fact this was written by a philosopher and not a psychologist in other words it was written by a non scientist and without any research to back his claims up it just becomes opinions not supported by facts but by cherry picked examples and sometimes not even that I am a scientist so while I might find his opinion interesting it doesn t really further my KNOWLEDGE on the subject because one man s opinion is as good as the next person s opin...


  8. says:

    I have mixed feelings about this one Oxford s A Very Short Introduction series presents itself as a collection of broad overviews on a variety of topics A thinking man s wikipedia according to the inside cover However this volume argues very strongly in favour of the Incongruity Yheory to the point that it seems outright dismissive of other approaches to the study of humour Some theories that I find interesting, such as the Benign Violation Theory, aren t even mentioned While it is a ver I have mixed feelings about this one Oxford s A Very Short Introduction series presents itself as a collection of broad overviews on a variety of topics A thinking man s wikipedia according to the inside cover However this volume argues very strongly in favour of the Incongruity Yheory to the point that it seems outright dismissive of other approa...


  9. says:

    A succinct but illustrative account of the concept..


  10. says:

    Took way too long to finish.A bit esoteric at times.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *